![]() ![]() “It is a risk we cannot afford to take lightly on the other hand, the purpose of the saber rattling is to intimidate us, as well as our European allies and the Ukrainians themselves,” he said. Burns added that he had to made clear to Russian officials the serious consequences of any use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. director, said the United States had to take seriously the nuclear “saber rattling” of Mr. Everyone must understand this.”Īt a speech in Washington on Thursday, William J. “But we have the means to respond, and it won’t end with the use of armor. ![]() “We aren’t sending our tanks to their borders,” he said. This week, in response to Germany’s decision to supply Ukraine with tanks, Mr. A nuclear threat last month by Dmitri Medvedev, the former Russian president who serves as a deputy chairman of Russia’s security council, was met mostly with shrugs in the United States. But overwrought threats, in the absence of other intelligence, are causing little stir. Putin moves tactical weapons into position as a reminder that he can back up his conventional forces. The Pentagon continues to war game what might happen if Mr. ![]() officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss deliberations. Inside the Biden administration, officials caution that Russia’s threats over nuclear escalation are not over, and that the next time the Kremlin wants to remind the West about the power of its arsenal, it could potentially move a nuclear weapon that it knows can be observed by the United States. But nearly a year into the war there, American policymakers and intelligence analysts have more confidence that they understand at least some of Mr. Putin’s red lines - and what kinds of support for Ukraine will prompt statements of condemnation versus what might risk something more dangerous. The possibility of nuclear escalation continues to influence American decisions over what advanced weaponry to give Ukraine. official said recently, may well have come to the conclusion that the threats, which he once saw as leverage, were backfiring. Several factors explain why, officials said: A more stable battlefield, China’s warnings against the use of nuclear weapons, improved communications between Moscow and Washington and an increased role of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Ukraine have contributed to a measure of stability. intelligence reported discussions among Russian military leaders about the use of such weapons.Ĭoncerns remain over Russia using a nuclear weapon, but the tensions have since abated. WASHINGTON - Last fall, tensions in Washington reached a crescendo as Moscow made persistent nuclear threats and U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |